Amend legislation to outline any information related to spills being reported by C-NLOPB without permission from companies,
1585
Are there sufficient human resources and infrastructure within province to detect and deal with a large scale spill,
1693
Besides 2004 incident of spill, what other examples can demonstrate how a major spill would result,
1389
Clarification of Premier's statement that impact of spill on ocean environment would be limited because of viscosity of our oil,
1295
Commit to independent observers on platforms to ensure greater protection,
1586
Confidence in our backup systems compared to those in United States,
980
Consider option of task force from industry groups to provide advice on ongoing basis,
977,
978
Create task force to consider emergency preparedness and mitigate effects of possible spill
Discrepancy between experts' opinion of lack of program to monitor spills and government's assurances,
862
Does Minister have concerns about drilling project technology and possible environmental disaster,
861
Does Minister see Louisiana's approach as backup to deal with disaster,
1294
Has government reviewed environmental safeguards for Chevron's ultra deep water drilling project,
861
Have there been changes to location of response equipment since 2007 and 2010 federal reports,
1694
How can Minister claim disaster readiness when company doing the drilling claims the opposite,
1292
How can we be guaranteed that recommendations for environmental and safety improvements are not delayed,
978
If air surveillance is best monitoring method, why does C-NLOPB not have mandatory program,
1587
Is there a comprehensive plan for potential spill in Placentia Bay,
1691–1692
Release data collected on aerial oil slicks at offshore platforms from start of Hibernia drilling to present,
1492–1493
Support concept of independent monitors on rigs,
1390
Task force to monitor environmental regulations in industry,
1391
To ensure proactive monitoring process, commit to creating task force to work on ongoing basis,
1588
Was Premier advised of changes to Canadian drilling regulations,
978
What actions were taken with federal counterparts to address findings in two federal reports,
1693
What backup plans are in place to detect oil spills in absence of aerial surveillance,
1493
What confidence does Minister have that our marine environment would not be severely impacted by a spill,
1293
What detailed analysis was completed regarding the 2007 Orphan Basin spill,
1492
What extra safety measures are implemented by Chevron above and beyond those used at Deepwater Horizon,
979,
980
What is process to respond to a large spill, given that nearest ocean tug is in Halifax,
1694
What provisions does Nalcor have to protect people from possible environmental and other costs,
650
When will details and framework for independent review board be available,
861–862
Whether Captain Turner is in a conflict of interest,
976–977
Why are there no independent observers on rigs off coast of Province,
981
Why has government not implemented emergency plan to address a spill in Placentia Bay,
1691
Why has it taken them three years to issue regulations,
979
Why haven't independent monitors been installed on rigs,
651–652
Why is government set against independent monitors who can demand proper industry regulations are being followed,
1494
Why is it so difficult to get information once a spill occurs,
1491
Why is the only time that aircraft fly to rigs for spill detection is when the C-NLOPB requests it,
1587
Why is there more concern for companies than for ensuring full oversight on drill rigs,
1586
Why not require independent monitors and observers on platforms,
1294
Why not take minimum precaution of putting independent observers on board,
981
Why support independent observers on fishing vessels but not in oil industry,
1390–1391
Why would rules be relaxed for an exploration project that is in deeper water than has ever been drilled off our shores,
1293
Will government implement a strategy as committed to seven years ago,
1692