Adjournment proceedings
Amendment to motion before debate
Amendment to motion in order
Apology is to be unequivocal
Chair will not hear accusations against the Chair
Chair will not recognize Members causing disorder until they apologize
Clarification whether Minister said Member was dishonest
Commentary should be directed to the Chair and Members should speak in the third person
Debate on motion pertaining to privilege must remain relevant
Distribution of bills
Galleries cleared
Language, unparliamentary
"fabricate"
"fool"
"has not got the guts"
"muzzled"
Matters of privilege shall be dealt with immediately
Member must apologize for shouting while answer is being given
Members are to be guided by remarks made by Chair regarding decorum
Members not to reflect upon any vote of the House except to move that such vote be rescinded
Members should not read from documents or newspapers
Members should not shout or interrupt
Members should not use personal names
Members to refrain from shouting back and forth
Money bills and relevance in debate
Naming
Dean, Mr. Marshall
Parsons, Kelvin
Opposition House Leader's remarks to be heard before determining whether amendment to resolution is in order
Petitions cannot be repeated one after the other
Petitions must be vetted through Clerk's Table and prayer of petition must be read through
Points of order should be raised when the disorder occurs
Prima facie case of breach of privilege
Relevance in second reading debate
Relevance to the motion
Respect to be shown to those asking questions
S.O. 63—Whether a Minister can introduce a Private Members' motion
Speaker must be able to hear directions of Government House Leader and the reading of bills by the Clerk
Speaker's impartiality challenged
Unparliamentary to ask Minister question as it relates to committee that he sits on in House
Visitors are not to show pleasure or displeasure for what is happening on floor
Whether Hansard or Broadcast prevail as evidence