Are embarrassing situations driving government to introduce legislation
Can Minister estimate how many departments have developed and posted directories of information
Does Minister of Health support changes in legislation in order to avoid future embarrassment
Explain how slipping back to second place in Canada is an improvement
How can Premier suggest that fee increases are not prohibitive
How do amendments forcing people to court to get information improve accessibility to information
How do amendments to legislation give the act any more teeth
How do amendments to legislation strengthen the role of the Information Commissioner
How does new direction fit with long-standing promise of full and prompt disclosure of information
How does simpler harms test protect the interests of people who elected this government
How has Bill 29 improved openness and accountability in government
How is accountability improved in new legislation
How is having to use court system rather than commissioner review not a step backwards
How many solicitor-client claims have there been since Minister was in office
How much income does government expect in ATIPPA fees under new regime
How will government regulate contemplation time compared with work time
How will Opposition be able to do its job if various types of information will not be made available
Impact of new legislation on ability for a complete and informed debate on Muskrat Falls
Is Minister of Municipal Affairs stalling until the new amendments to act are passed
Before legislation passes, will Minister of Health provide people of St. Anthony with information about the relocated air ambulance service
Problem of lack of guidelines on what constitutes a vexatious request
Rationale for going beyond the recommendations of the Cummings report
Repeal the passage of Bill 29
Urging government to repeal Bill 29, notice of motion
Was the Information and Privacy Commissioner consulted on the drafting of Bill 29
What does Government House Leader have to fear from access to information
What does Premier have to say to people of Province regarding change in direction of access
What message was Minister trying to send by approving release of nearly six pages of redacted information
What steps has government taken to ensure full compliance with the present legislation
When was last report submitted on number of requests granted or denied
Why did government not accept recommendation that Information and Privacy Commissioner appointment should be for five years
Why did government present misinformation about number of access requests that it receives
Why did Minister of Justice not know the details of Bill 29
Why did Premier allow court case to go on so long and delay the release of information
Why did Premier go against consultant's recommendation and extend the reach of Cabinet secrecy
Why do politicians get to decide whether a request is frivolous
Why does amendment allow for one-part test, when six other jurisdictions use a three-part test
Why does legislation go beyond Cummings' suggestion and remove the substantive test for Cabinet confidences
Why does legislation restrict role of Auditor General
Why does Minister insist that the legislation is good, given strong national opposition
Why force changes deemed dangerously undemocratic
Why give notice of closure motion to stifle debate on the bill
Why has government destroyed the fine balance between people's right to information and obligation to protect privacy
Why has government thrown up unnecessary roadblocks to information access, and when will she take steps to remove them
Why insist on amendments to bill that affronts democracy
Why is government breaking its promise to be open and transparent
Why is government continuing to fly in the face of best practices and expert advice in its decision making
Why is government forcing people into court action on matters which could have been referred to the Privacy Commissioner
Why is government pushing legislation which makes Province a national embarrassment
Why is government seeking to overturn Supreme Court decision on client-solicitor privilege
Why is Minister making it harder for people to access information
Why is Minister making it harder for people to access their own information
Why is Minister moving in opposite direction from Justice Green's recommendations
Why is Premier abandoning past Conservative philosophy
Why is Premier going beyond recommendations of Cummings report and is current legislation to protect Ministers
Why is Premier limiting access around important decisions like Muskrat Falls
Why is Premier limiting access to information and making government more secretive
Why is Premier making it more expensive for people to access information
Why is Premier not allowing debate on serious issues
Why such a secret and oppressive manner of governance
Why was solicitor-client privilege apparently used inappropriately by government
Why will Minister of Municipal Affairs not release report which is already partially made public
Will amendments be considered in current session
Will amendments to legislation be brought forward in June
Will Bill 29 be proclaimed before the special debate on Muskrat Falls
Will government now control what information is available to debate Muskrat Falls
Will Minister admit that Office of Public Engagement is a worthless public relations exercise
Will Minister amend Bill 29 and make total compensation information available
Will Minister amend the bill to ensure that Commissioner has the power to investigate a whistle-blower's complaint
Will Minister explain his comments about chill that comes over public service sector regarding making Ministerial briefing notes accessible
Will Minister revoke amendments to bill and save Province from further national embarrassment
Will Mr. Ring be reappointed as Information and Privacy Commissioner, or will there be a political appointment
Will new law restrict access to information by the public for inquiries and major issues
Will Premier amend Bill 29
Will Premier withdraw legislation forced through the House last week