On April 20, did Premier reach out to Mr. Ken Marshall to discuss the board of directors' pending action,
1865
On April 20, did the Premier know the financial obligations of what the board were doing,
1866
Can Premier assure people that the new Chief Executive Officer is not in a conflict of interest under the act,
733
Can Premier back up his remarks with concrete evidence,
686
Can Premier explain how Department of Justice documentation would be prejudicial to the investigation being done by Auditor General,
1710–1711
Can the Premier confirm that the interim chair of the board of directors was the individual who provided the legal opinion and wrote the settlement agreement regarding the former Chief Executive Officer of Nalcor,
1950
Could Premier identify under which branch of the Department of Justice such an inquiry would fit,
1662
Did Mr. Martin resign, or was he fired, and why was the severance required,
1547
Did Premier actually see the legal opinion,
1619
Did Premier discuss a contract or settlement with Mr. Martin in his April 19 meeting with him and the Minister of Natural Resources,
1652
Did Premier discuss severance with Mr. Martin on April 19,
1616,
1617
Did Premier have any discussions with the board on the future employment of Mr. Martin,
1623
Did Premier have conversation with Mr. Martin about a settlement or financial package,
1657
Did Premier have dialogue with board leading up from Sunday to Tuesday when the decision was made,
1546–1547
Did Premier know on April 20th that the board was terminating Mr. Martin,
1653–1654
Did Premier know that Mr. Green had provided the advice at the time he appointed him as chair,
1950
Did Premier meet with, or have discussions with members of the Nalcor board to discuss his departure,
1623
Did Premier or anyone from his office have a conversation with anyone from the former board of Nalcor regarding Mr. Martin's resignation, the termination of his contract, or a possible severance payout,
1662
Did Premier provide direction to the Auditor General to consider when he had discussion with Mr. Martin and when his appointment was negotiated,
1769
Did Premier reach out to Mr. Ken Marshall to discuss the matter, as he indicated he would in his response to the email,
1864
Did Premier receive a written report from the Department of Justice on Saturday,
1709
Did Premier receive any correspondence from the board or a representative of the board regarding compensation for Mr. Martin,
1657
Did Premier receive correspondence by letter, email, or phone call, regarding Mr. Martin's severance,
1656
Did Premier reply to Ken Marshall's April 20 email, and what did he do as a result of receiving this significant information,
1865
Did the former Chief Executive Officer leave voluntarily or was he fired,
1546
Did the former Chief Executive Officer resign or did the board dismiss him without cause,
1546
Did the Premier advise Mr. Martin on April 19 that government had decided Mr. Martin should step down as Chief Executive Officer of Nalcor and receive severance pay as per his employment contract,
1773
Did the Premier or anyone on his behalf communicate to any member or representative of the Nalcor board of directors that government was in agreement with severance pay being paid to Mr. Martin,
1774
Did the way forward include agreement that Mr. Martin would be paid severance even though he said publicly that he was resigning,
1716–1717
Didn't Premier speak to the Board of Directors to find out what was not in the contract,
1550
Does Minister know that the Auditor General Act gives the Auditor General unfettered powers in conducting inquiries into the financial affairs of public properties,
1661
Does Premier agree with the Auditor General's conclusion that Mr. Martin was constructively dismissed,
4043–4044
Given that Premier committed repeatedly in the House to release the Department of Justice report as soon as it is available, will he now table the report,
1766
Given that the important work of the province has been sidelined by a crisis of public confidence in the handling of this matter, will Premier do the right thing and resign,
1868
Has Premier received any advice from anybody suggesting that he change his position, and not release the details that he had promised to release,
1712
Has the Premier passed over documentation regarding severance to the Auditor General or not,
1765
How and when did Premier find out that Mr. Martin was receiving a severance,
1655
How can Premier justify not having appointed a member from Labrador, nor a member from a Labrador Aboriginal community, to the Board of Directors,
3555
How can Premier reconcile the contents of the April 20 email with his continuing evasion in the House as to when he became aware that severance would be paid to Mr. Martin,
1868
How could Premier say he used a legal opinion as part of his decision-making process when he is now saying that he never saw a legal opinion,
1620
How did Premier become aware that there was a severance package for Mr. Martin,
1656
How did Premier even know there was a legal opinion, if nobody shared it with him,
1621
How does Premier explain having said that Mr. Martin had resigned when he knew he had been terminated without cause,
1653
How does Premier explain his comments yesterday that on April 20th he was aware that Mr. Martin was being terminated without cause,
1654
If Premier felt at the time that the email misrepresented the situation in any way, what steps did he take to put those concerns on the record,
1868
If Premier had a problem with the $1.4 million severance, why didn't he take action,
1617
If Premier knew Mr. Martin was entitled to a settlement, why was that not an important enough matter to keep his eye on,
1655
If the House of Assembly is not open at the time, will Premier reconvene the House of Assembly so that the report from the Auditor General can be debated,
1713
Is Premier okay with the fact that two ministers did not apply due diligence as suggested by the Auditor General,
4046
Is Premier or is Auditor General correct concerning the Chief Executive Officer of Nalcor,
4043
Is Premier saying that decisions were made on verbal advice, when yesterday he had referred to a legal opinion,
1620
Is Premier saying that he won't publicly state his confidence in the management and leadership of Nalcor,
1767
Is Premier saying that the Auditor General could be influenced by the information that he is tabling here in the House of Assembly,
1712
Is the new Chief Executive Officer appointment the first step towards getting rid of Muskrat Falls at a bargain basement price,
686
Is the scenario that was discussed that Mr. Martin was to stay or leave with his contractual severance paid out,
1767
Knowing the Auditor General has said that public controversy will not prejudice his work, will Premier now table the documents that he previously committed to,
1765
During Premier's meeting with Mr. Martin on April 17th, did Mr. Martin say he was going to resign,
1615
Prior to April 17, did the Premier discuss with Stan Marshall the possibility of his becoming the Chief Executive Officer of Nalcor,
1773
With the sudden departure of such an important position, why would the Premier's office not be involved,
1662
Was Premier informed of what the legal opinion was,
1622
Was Premier not being honest with the people of the province, or was he being incompetent,
1867
Was the issue of severance discussed with Mr. Martin,
1615–1616
Was the issue of severance first discussed on Tuesday night or Sunday night,
1616
Was there a resolution from Nalcor suggesting what Premier is saying today,
1548
Were minutes kept for the April 17 and April 19 meetings,
1659
Were notes taken at meetings on April 17 and April 19, and was there an agenda and minutes for the meeting,
1658
On what basis did the Premier determine that severance was required as part of the contract,
1547–1548
What caused them to reach conclusion to call in the Auditor General,
1708
What date did the Premier first meet with Stan Marshall and talk to him about becoming the Chief Executive Officer,
1769
What did Premier instruct the Department of Justice to do on May 5, and who in the department was assigned the task to complete the assignment,
1618
What discussions has the new Chief Executive Officer of Nalcor had about energy assets and partnerships with the Province of Quebec,
4042
What is Premier's version of events now,
1654
What is the current projection for when the province will receive return on equity from Nalcor,
297
What observations were made by the Department of Justice which led Premier to call in the Auditor General,
1708
What records were kept for the April 17 and April 19 meetings,
1658–1659
What specific provision of the executive employment agreement can Premier point to that led him to the contention that Mr. Martin was entitled to severance pay in the event of his resignation,
1550
What was the legal opinion that was provided, and will the Premier table it in the House,
1619
What were the scenarios discussed concerning Mr. Martin,
1657
When did Premier first have discussion with Stan Marshall about the Chief Executive Officer position,
1768–1769
When did Premier first have discussions with Stan Marshall on taking over the Chief Executive Officer position,
4046–4047
When does Premier expect review of the issue of Mr. Martin's severance to be finished,
1625
When Premier announced Mr. Martin's resignation on April 20, was he aware that it was actually a termination rather than a resignation,
1615
Who did Premier contact in the Department of Justice,
1618
Who provided the legal opinion to the Premier,
1620,
1621
Who will the Auditor General report to with his findings in this matter,
1713
Why are there two different stories on whether Mr. Martin was terminated without cause or that he had resigned,
1653
Why did government not have an orderly transition,
685
Why did it take three weeks for the Premier or anyone in government to take action on the matter,
1864
Why did Premier not immediately inform the public of the discrepancy between Nalcor's announcement and that of the Chief Executive Officer,
1623
Why did Premier tell media yesterday that he knew on the 20th that Mr. Martin was being terminated without cause,
1654–1655
Why did Premier wait until yesterday to make public the fact that he had provided direction to the Department of Justice to review the matter,
1618–1619
Why didn't Premier pick up the phone and ask questions about the contract obligations,
1865–1866
Why didn't Premier pick up the phone and call the chair to find out what was happening,
1867
Why didn't Premier pick up the phone and find out what was going on, and what the consequences were,
1866
Why didn't Premier take the time to get details about a severance package,
1866–1867
Why didn't the Premier immediately get the Department of Justice involved,
1624
Why does the new board of directors not include someone with major hydro development experience other than the Chief Executive Officer,
3556
Why does the Premier identify different rules for the hiring and the termination of the Chief Executive Officer of Nalcor,
4047
Why is Premier wasting time asking a government department with the same legislative powers of investigation into Crown Corporations as the Auditor General to carry out an inquiry for which it has no defined process,
1661
Why won't Premier live up to the commitment he made to release the information from the Department of Justice,
1711
Why would Premier not go directly to the Auditor General when this is such a crucial issue for the people of the province,
1624–1625
Why would Premier say that the individual voluntarily left, without checking with the board and checking with Nalcor first,
1547
Will Premier ask the Auditor General to consider the fact that he and his government refused to state confidence or lack of confidence in the board of directors or Mr. Marshall and the executive team, and will the Auditor General consider whether there was a circumstance created by Premier and his government whereby a constructive dismissal of Mr. Martin was created,
1716
Will Premier bring a resolution to the House of Assembly to ask the Auditor General to investigate the full circumstances of Mr. Martin's departure and the board's conduct in approving severance and bonus payments,
1624
Will Premier confirm that meeting with the former Chief Executive Officer of Nalcor, the Premier's Chief of Staff and the Minister of Natural Resources took place,
1766
Will Premier ensure that the Auditor General considers the appointment of Stan Marshall as part of his review,
1769–1770
Will Premier explain why he doesn't agree with the Auditor General's account of what caused the termination of Mr. Martin,
4044
Will Premier reveal what scenarios were discussed about Mr. Martin,
1658
Will Premier share results of meetings with the House, or will he wait for the House to close for the summer break before wrapping this up,
1659
Will Premier stick to his commitment to table information from the Department of Justice,
1710
Will Premier table all of the pertinent information in the House this afternoon,
1622
Will Premier table an up-to-date version of the graph entitled Nalcor Energy Equity Investments and Payback in the budget speech,
297
Will Premier table documents, information and opinion from the Department of Justice in the House of Assembly,
1709–1710
Will Premier table report from the Department of Justice in the House of Assembly today,
1709
Will Premier table the Board's resolution regarding the termination of Mr. Martin,
1622
Will Premier table the documents with details of what actually took place, as he committed to do,
1767–1768
Will Premier table the legal opinion that guided decisions that were made,
1619
Will the Auditor General also be investigating the potential involvement of the Premier, his staff, his cabinet and his colleagues,
1714
Will the Auditor General have access to the Premier's supposed telephone logs and the emails in and out of his office,
1715
Will the Auditor General look at any involvement, advice, direction or assistance that the Minister of Finance has provided, given the fact that she's a former Chair of Nalcor and was a board member when the contract was entered into with Mr. Martin,
1714
Will the Auditor General look at the minutes of meetings, the fact that the Premier met with Stan Marshall prior to the resignation of Mr. Martin, and the fact that the Premier provided conflicting information regarding when he became aware of the severance,
1715
Will the Auditor General report be made public as soon as it completed,
1713
Will the Auditor General's investigation look into the involvement of the Premier's office directly with the former Nalcor board of directors, or with any individual members of that board concerning the severance issue,
1716
Will the Auditor General's review include any and all information available, including the activities of the Minister of Natural Resources and her attendance at meetings,
1714
Will the Premier instruct the Chief Executive Officer to release real information about the state of the Muskrat Falls project,
686