Are departmental officials sometimes asked to send information to Premier's office and not directly to Minister,
365–366
Can Premier confirm that government is not a third party in the lawsuit,
529–530
Clarification that stoppage of lab testing did not mean that the entire lab was shut down for five weeks,
631
Did Cabinet discuss Eastern Health's responsibility to be proactive in releasing information to public,
472
Did Cabinet discuss issue in October or November of 2005,
370
Did former Minister of Health, Mr. Osborne, bring issue to Premier's attention,
254
Did Minister of Health discuss issue with Premier after his January 2007 appointment,
255
Did Mr. Thompson as Clerk ever mention issue to Premier in July 2005,
369
Did Ms. Brazil make petition to the inquiry at Premier and Dept. of Justice's request,
1230
Did Premier discuss matter with Minister Ottenheimer in October 2005,
255–256
Did Premier ever discuss issue with Minister Ottenheimer after October 2005,
256
Did Premier give testimony under oath and was it recorded,
312
Did Premier not already assign blame by firing former Chief Executive Officer of Eastern Health and former Deputy Minister,
309
Did Premier or staff give directive for information to be sent to his office without knowledge of former health minister,
365
Did Premier's staff brief him on the issue in July 2005,
308–309
Did Social Policy Committee of Cabinet ever discuss the issue,
314
Does Premier acknowledge conflict of interest and will he remove Mr. Thompson as government liaison to inquiry,
369
Does Premier consider Minister incompetent, and is he going to take action,
466–467
Does Premier expect Ministers to read briefing notes for their departments,
464–465
Does Premier feel Minister of Health's comments on Eastern Health were appropriate,
308
Does Premier feel that attacking personalities of those testifying is appropriate,
1232–1233
Does Premier intend to have discussions with Eastern Health to pursue issue of settlement,
530
Does Premier think it appropriate that he is making comments about inquiry before he testifies,
1228
Ensure end to unwritten policy that women scheduled for breast cancer surgery are asked to consent to be sent home immediately,
532
Has Premier received subpoena compelling his testimony at inquiry,
247–248,
311
How could Minister have stated that individuals were being provided with necessary support,
464
How did Premier's meeting with counsel come about,
312
How many current and former members of the civil service have been issued subpoenas for the inquiry,
313
How many current or former members of Premier's staff have been issued subpoenas for the inquiry,
313
How much has government spent on Open Line transcripts with regard to inquiry,
1233,
1240
Is "do not ask/do not tell" a policy of government,
253
Is anyone in Premier's staff directed to give key messages to open line callers to influence public opinion,
1233
Is appointment of Robert Thompson to inquiry impacting public confidence due to possible conflict of interest,
258
Is government aware of Eastern Health's problem with accessing beds in intensive care units,
473
Is government trying to avoid the fact that it has not properly invested in recruitment and retention by laying blame on inquiry,
1235
Is Mr. Thompson in a conflict of interest,
310
Is Premier disturbed by drug decision rationale as outlined in documents prepared for Cabinet meeting,
374
Is Premier prepared to bring government resources to the table to ensure settlement,
531
Is Premier prepared to grant extension to inquiry,
1231–1232
Is Premier prepared to invest whatever money is needed for work of inquiry, and to address its recommendations,
1296–1297
Is Premier saying that inquiry is contributing to pathologists leaving the Province,
1228
Is Premier saying that issue never went to Cabinet table,
257
Is there a policy at Eastern Health requiring patients undergoing double mastectomies to consent to being immediately discharged,
471
Is there more than one radiologist on staff at Eastern Health to read magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reports,
471
Look after patients being excluded from settlements,
2821
Minister of Justice asked to seek direction from inquiry as to provision of detail in the legislature,
313
Since Dr. Banerjee's letter of February 2006, what has government done to address issue of pathologists,
372
Was John Abbott removed as Deputy Minister of Health in 2007 in relation to this issue,
367–368
Was Premier's office advised of issue in July 2005,
248
Were documents prepared for 4 November 2005 Cabinet meeting ever discussed,
373
Were Premier's comments on liability of Eastern Health appropriate,
530
What actions are being taken to create protocol for patient follow-up and contact in the future,
471
What changes is Premier making to his office operations to ensure he will be advised on important issues,
370
What is being done differently at this inquiry than previous inquiries,
1229
What is Centre of Excellence that government refers to, and how has it improved situation,
470
What is Premier prepared to do to realize expectation of settlement,
531
What makes this case different in terms of overrruling decisions and advice of a board,
252–253
When did Premier appear before Commission counsel,
312
Where did Premier get details clarifying closure of lab,
635
Who are other members of government inquiry liaison team,
311
Why did government go to court to block release of peer reviews designed to improve lab,
371–372
Why did Government not respond to media interviews or reports on the issue prior to spring 2007,
306–307
Why did Minister and Premier not have dedicated meeting on issue of retesting,
467
Why did Minister continuously state that all patients had been contacted,
465–466
Why did no one confirm that information provided by Eastern Health was factual,
466
Why did Premier change his mind in terms of speaking out on issue,
529
Why did Premier not discuss issues of communication strategy in 4 November 2005 Cabinet meeting,
374
Why did Premier not follow up with Eastern Health on how patients were being contacted,
366
Why did Premier not go public when he was given updated numbers in August 2006,
367
Why did Premier not take lead and bring information to public during eighteen month period,
249–252
Why did the Premier wait so long to ensure patients were contacted by their physicians,
463–464
Why does Premier believe that limiting the inquiry's questions would help patients,
1227
Why does Premier feel the need to attack witnesses and intimidate further testimony,
1232
Why has government not contacted nineteen patients yet,
462–463
Why has government not put more money aside for cost of implementing recommendations,
932–933
Why is it Premier's or Attorney General's job to represent government at the inquiry,
1229
Why was Ms. Brazil not directed to intervene before Premier and Minister of Justice undermined integrity of inquiry,
1230
Why was Premier's office engaged in editing communication releases issued from Eastern Health,
469–470
Why were Dr. Howell and Mr. Tilley not questioned at May 17 Cabinet meeting,
468
Why would Premier interfere with Justice Cameron's judgment on conduct and control of inquiry,
1288
Why would Premier say that inquiry has become a prosecution, and undermine its integrity,
1226–1227
Why would Premier want to use inflammatory language against inquiry and undermine its ability to restore confidence in health care system,
1287–1288
Will Premier allow inquiry to proceed without added stress of his public intervention,
1297–1298
Will Premier allow resources for Judge Cameron to finish her job,
1290
Will Premier apologize for his comments to women and their families,
1236–1237
Will Premier assure that inquiry will be able to continue its work, so that women can get answers,
1236
Will Premier commit adequate money for Commission to finish its work,
1297
Will Premier give inquiry right to search for information independent of government,
310–311
Will Premier make more money available in this fiscal year if necessary to meet recommendations,
933
Will Premier provide dates that he was briefed on issue by Minister Osborne,
254–255
Will Premier remove Mr. Thompson as government liaison to Commission since he must testify,
309–310
Will Premier withdraw application to limit questions and allow inquiry to do its job,
1289
Would memo and communications plan have been discussed at the Cabinet table,
314