Are Canopy Growth's facilities paid for by revenues from the production and retail of marijuana, and are the Canopy Growth facilities owned by the company or by the taxpayers,
1548
Are provincial government and Canopy Growth the only partners in the deal, or are there others,
2121
To the best of minister's knowledge, does Gary Anstey have ties to the Liberal Party,
2120
Can minister advise what specific changes have been made to Canopy's schedule,
2729–2730
Can minister confirm that a store downtown is running a contest for free cannabis for a year, and is convinced they will get a licence from government,
358
Can minister guarantee the House that Health Canada will ensure there is no criminal activity by companies doing business or investing in the cannabis industry in this province,
2373
Can minister identify who the other companies are that are being considered for tax credits, and if a deal has been done,
2069–2070
Can minister provide an update regarding who owns the property being leased to Canopy Growth, held in a numbered company,
2123
Can minister tell House whether the numbered company purchased the land only after Canopy had selected the land as the site of the production facility, and if he does not know the answer to the question, does he think he should know,
2546
Could minister outline the penalties with regard to the contract with Canopy Growth, and if any have been executed with regard to delivery, supply or other elements of the agreement,
2188
Did Canopy provide warranties or guarantees to the effect that they were in a position to meet the demands of the local marketplace,
2030
Did Canopy reach the milestone of 50 per cent production completed by October 1,
2730
Did government formally excuse Canopy Growth from compliance with the 90-day purchase requirement of the agreement,
2547
Did minister direct his Deputy Minister, Ted Lomond, to make the deal happen,
2185
Did Premier meet with Jeffrey Ryan, the lobbyist,
2185
Did someone tell Minister of Finance not to answer the question,
2496–2497
Did the numbered company 80521 NL own the land that the minister stood on at the time he wielded his shovel,
2546
Does agreement with Canopy Growth allow for partial tax credits to be remitted to Canopy Growth for capital cost, a portion or all of them, to be interrupted and then someone else own that asset at some point in the future,
2122
Does agreement with Canopy Growth ensure that they are the only recipient or beneficiary of the $40 million in tax credits from the people of Newfoundland and Labrador,
2121
Does department's agreement with Canopy Growth penalize them for their inability to provide the supply,
1902
Does lobbyist Jeffrey Ryan have ties to the Liberal Party,
2119
Does minister believe that $40 million should give this province some priority on meeting supply, or is it just a free-for-all for this company that you have no control over,
1902
Does minister intend to follow through and look into the identity of the shareholders of the numbered company and report back to the House,
2299
Does minister know whether this is a lease-to-buy set-up, which makes the benefactor of the tax credit someone other than Canopy Growth,
2122
Does minister know who the shareholders of the numbered company are,
2848–2849
Does minister take refuge in ability to decline to answer any question, or did he find out the names of the shareholders in the numbered company that owns Canopy Growth,
2496
Does Premier think it appropriate for Canopy Growth to not report their lobbying activities with department,
1722
Given that Canopy Growth is publicly traded and the deal with government would increase the share value of the company, what precautions were taken to ensure this information was kept confidential before the deal was announced,
1723–1724
Government not providing Canopy Growth with up-front money or tax credit,
3106
Has government approved any other cannabis deals to date,
3332
Has minister been able to determine who actually owns the numbered company,
2298,
2335
Has Minister of Finance determined who owns the numbered company that owns the land leased to Canopy Growth,
2373
Has minister or his officials met with representatives of the numbered company that owns the land's lease,
2374
Have steps been taken to try to find out the ownership of the numbered company,
2298
Health Canada licensing process clarification,
2126
How can minister ensure compliance with the arms-length requirement of the agreement without knowing the identity of the shareholders of the numbered company,
2548
How did Premier know that the now highly subsidized Canopy Growth deal was the best for the province, when no other companies were even asked to bid,
1213–1214
How do we refute suspicion in the public mind that the numbered company is benefiting because of ties to the Liberal party,
2849
How many licences are approved today in Newfoundland and Labrador,
2123
How much more of people's money is Premier going to give away to rich multinationals for recreational cannabis,
2380
How will marijuana grown in this province compete against cheaper, equal quality marijuana sold online,
1159
If Canopy delivers in the twelfth month of the year, would that still meet the requirements of the contract, even though for 11 months they made no deliveries,
2188
If minister did not investigate who the beneficiary is along the chain of investors, how does he ensure the protection of the public investment and security of the public in general,
2187
Is Canopy following the contract or not following the contract, with regard to the 90-day time frame to purchase land,
2850
Is Canopy fulfilling its supply contract with the Newfoundland Liquor Corporation,
3331
Is Canopy meeting its targets and if it is, why are there shortages,
3332
Is Canopy really just doing a pass-through of the $40 million of taxpayer money to a numbered company whose shareholders have Liberal lobbyists, but whose identities remain unknown,
2185
Is either minister confirming that the site development in Freshwater is not related to the legalization of marijuana,
1306
Is it government's policy that the secrecy surrounding the ownership of numbered companies is essential to the economic development of province,
2298
Is it minister's position that no due diligence is required whatsoever of the provincial government to ensure there is no criminal activity by investors in this province's cannabis industry,
2373
Is it not true that Canopy is incurring construction costs and that clause 3.6 requires that for expenditures to be eligible for government money, they can only be incurred with respect to an arm's length corporation,
2548
Is minister aware that Gary Anstey is the registered lobbyist for Biome Grow in Newfoundland and Labrador,
2120
Is minister confirming that Canopy did indeed violate the 90-day provision of the agreement,
2547
Is minister considering a $40 million tax credit incentive program to other companies in this province related to the production of cannabis,
2029–2030
Is minister okay with a marijuana storefront operation being 600 metres from an elementary school,
1307–1308
Is minister okay with a storefront operation being set up 450 metres from a junior high school,
1308
Is minister okay with three storefront and retail outlets having been issued licences in Conception Bay South,
1308
Is minister saying that we can put utter faith in the federal level of government, and that no further due diligence on the identities of people involved in the industry is necessary,
2334
Is minister telling the House that he is relying on auditors to guarantee the arms' length nature of the relationship between Canopy and the numbered company and to know who the shareholders are, but that he does not need to know,
2549
Is Premier aware that Jeffrey Ryan is the registered lobbyist for Canopy Growth within the province,
2119
Is timing of email regarding contact with Canopy from former Liberal party executive member, now Deputy Minister of Tourism, Culture, Industry and Innovation, also a coincidence,
2184
At the time of the sod-turning on the site of the future Canopy Growth facility, did minister know who owned the land that he was digging,
2546
Timelines for cannabis contract,
2790
Urging government to bring forward legislation to require every privately held numbered company operating in the province that does business with the provincial government to disclose the identities of its significant shareholders
Urging government to urge the Government of Canada to delay marijuana legalization unless both levels of government can assure Newfoundlanders and Labradorians that effective measures are in place to inform people of the impacts of legalization, monitor, evaluate and respond to the impacts in real time, address any social and medical consequences as they arise, protect people from marijuana-impaired drivers, protect people from second-hand exposure to marijuana products and compensate our province promptly and fully for any negative fiscal impacts on legalization
Was Canopy's original agreement amended and will the minister table the amended agreement,
2730
Was minister aware of Health Canada's licensing requirement last week,
2123
What incentive will there be for people in this province to buy locally, if the prices here are higher,
1159
What investigation did Minister of Finance undertake, and did he find out the names,
2186
What other companies are being considered to receive the same tax breaks and incentives as given to Canopy Growth,
1158
What other companies have been offered the same $40 million deal to set up production in Newfoundland and Labrador,
1307
What percentage completion has Canopy Growth reported for construction,
2187
Why did minister approve a marijuana storefront operation being located 600 metres from an elementary school,
1307
Why does a privately traded, approximately $11 billion dollar company have to lease a piece of land upon which to construct a $50 million facility, and we are putting in $40 million in tax credits,
2069
Why has government felt it necessary to offer $40 million of tax rebates and incentives to a multi-million dollar, out-of-province company in order for them to set up in this province,
1158
Why has minister chosen to shovel money into Canopy Growth and the secret shareholder company while BeeHigh can succeed on its own,
2729
Why is it acceptable that a numbered company, with unknown shareholders, can be involved in the industry in this province,
2334
Why wasn't an RFP issued for the supply of cannabis in this province,
1213
Why wasn't growing and investing in our local business community minister's focus,
897
Why wouldn't government ensure that Canopy Growth and its 145 jobs be set up in an area with high unemployment, instead of in St. John's,
1214
Will any of the marijuana grown here and subsidized by the Newfoundland and Labrador taxpayers be shipped out of the province,
1158–1159
Will BeeHigh Vital Elements also be receiving a multi-million dollar taxpayer subsidy,
2729
Will Canopy Growth own the $50 million building which the people of the province paid for,
2121–2122
Will Canopy Growth use a method similar to that for alcohol sales to get back for any infrastructure they build in Newfoundland for production and retail of cannabis until their $40 million investment is paid back to them,
1547
Will Canopy Growth, after having been given $40 million of Newfoundland taxpayers' money, be able to compete with local industry to apply for additional money for any of the province's agricultural grants or subsidies,
357
Will minister enforce agreement with Canopy and act on his duty to inform the taxpayer,
2549
Will minister or Premier call in the Auditor General to investigate the Canopy Growth deal and give the taxpayers the answers they deserve,
2732
Will minister provide update on the investigation into the identity of the numbered company that's leasing land to Canopy Growth,
2186
Will other cannabis production facilities be offered the same sweetheart deal as the heavily subsidized Canopy Growth agreement,
1215
Will the Dept. of Finance audit Canopy's compliance or will outside auditors,
2731–2732
Will there be additional financial commitments to Canopy Growth,
357
Would a government-approved marijuana store be permitted to give away a year's worth of free product, recognizing that the Newfoundland Liquor Corporation cannot do so with alcohol,
358–359
Would minister confirm that direct construction costs and direct land acquisition costs are eligible expenditures,
2547–2548
Would minister table the amended agreement so people can see it,
2731
Would the Premier ask the lobbyist commissioner to review suspicious activities, lobbying activities, and any political connections to the lobbyist,
2120–2121