Are there agreements to sell the power to mining companies that are developing in Labrador,
2002
As compensation for bypassing communities, is Premier prepared to bring those residents' electricity rates in line with those paid by other customers,
3379
Given that Manitoba Hydro has admitted to vast cost overruns, is Premier confident that they can be trusted with our project,
3190
Has an industrial power rate been established for the Labrador mining industry,
2043–2044
Has Nalcor looked at numbers for keeping all of power in Province
versus the thirty-five year power contract with Emera,
2045
Has there been analysis of the Environmental Impact Statement, construction time frame, or cost,
2003
The House now supports the development of the Muskrat Falls Hydro Project
How can Premier justify project based on Manitoba Hydro's endorsement, when their projects have included failures,
3189
How can Premier justify supporting the Public Utilities Board in Newfoundland Power's rate requests review, but not support them on reviewing Muskrat Falls,
3483
How is it fair that the same power will go to Maritime Canada at a cheaper rate than to Newfoundlanders, and some Labrador communities obtain power from Quebec at 55 per cent greater cost than Quebec residents,
3078–3079
How will government protect interests of Labradorians to ensure they receive maximum benefits from project,
3078
How will mining companies access power from Muskrat Falls,
3021
How will power be delivered to Labrador for mining industry, given the absence of registered transmission lines,
109
If forty per cent of the power is earmarked for the island, will the other sixty per cent remain in Labrador if the demand exists,
2044
If government's predictions about mining potential in Labrador come to fruition, who will get priority for power,
3020
If power is needed for Labrador mining to proceed, why continue with agreement with Emera,
2044–2045
Is government now prepared to send project to a full review of the Public Utilities Board,
3190
Is it right that the power should go over the heads of Labrador children, who have to cross the border to skate because of high hydro bills,
3812–3813
Is Premier using 12 per cent as cost overrun number only to keep the published cost of the project low,
3189
Labrador not mentioned in terms of reference,
308
What firm agreements are in place for Muskrat Falls power for Labrador,
108
What is Premier's commitment to people of Labrador, given that children have to skate in Québec due to high power costs in their own communities,
3813
What mining companies have been offered power, and at what terms,
2002
Why can Newfoundland Power and the Consumer Advocate call witnesses to the Public Utilities Board, but that right is denied people of province on Muskrat Falls,
3482
Why did Premier choose to pay a development royalty to the Innu and fail all other Labradorians by excluding them from receiving any long-term benefits,
3378
Why does Minister see Public Utilities Board as good enough to be involved in industrial rates in Labrador, but not to set the Muskrat Falls power rates,
3535
Why isn't Premier open to dealing with legitimate concerns being raised by Aboriginal groups in Labrador,
3812
Why was Premier prepared to sacrifice coastal communities of Labrador to provide power to the island, Nova Scotia, and Eastern Seaboard of the United States,
3378
Will government become directly involved with building new transmission capacity for Labrador mining and industry,
3021
Will government terminate agreement with Emera Energy and leave power in Labrador for communities and industry,
109
Will Premier reveal details of SNC-Lavalin contract with government and Nalcor, for $60 million engineering and project management,
3188