After having tried to expedite the process, why has sanction been slowed,
3590–3591
Alternative power sources to,
1633(5)–1633(8)
Are there agreements to sell the power to mining companies that are developing in Labrador,
2002
Are there any export markets willing to pay the actual cost of construction,
2102
Based on the math provided, how can it drop three cents,
3593
Can Premier secure financing while court challenge on environmental assessment issues is ongoing,
430–431
Can the four subsidiaries be sold to one of the other partners, or control go to one of the other partners,
3425
Commit that all revenue generated by Muskrat Falls power will be used to offset rates for people of province, who are paying for 100 per cent of project,
2956–2957
Confirm whether Nalcor could privatize assets belonging to people of Newfoundland and Labrador, if Province does not have money to pay its debt for building Muskrat Falls,
3424
Confirm whether Nalcor had required a performance bond from SNC-Lavalin,
1235
Confirm whether the Maritime Link, owned by Emera, will go to Granite canal, or is it stopping at Bottom Brook,
3139
Cost of oil,
3203–3204
Could Minister reveal the name of the engineering firm to whom independent engineer belongs,
3599
Decision gate process
Decision on sanction to be based on people's best interest, Kennedy
Did government do full analysis of independent review recommendation 4.2,
375
Did Nalcor cut and paste from the Texas Oil and Gas manuals for their Environmental Impact Statement,
1785
Did the SNC-Lavalin vice-president who is under investigation have any involvement with Lower Churchill project,
1076–1077
Does Minister of Finance expect low to middle-income families will have the ability to pay for higher electricity bills,
3383
Explain rejection of two recommendations from independent review,
374–375
Explain rejection of wind farm as viable option,
376
Explain why Nalcor is uncertain about Upper Churchill power after 2041,
272
Given delay with Emera, why not give Public Utilities Board time to explore other power options,
530–531
Given Dr. Wade Lock's comments, will government now reconsider and go to the Public Utilities Board,
3377
Given possible impact on SNC-Lavalin, is Minister expecting further slowdowns related to DG3 numbers,
1129
Given recent media remarks on American energy market, is there a New England market for this project,
1189
Given section 3.5 of the term sheet for the loan guarantee, why is Premier denying ability of future governments to manage our own Crown assets,
3417–3418
Given that government is rushing legislation through, haven't they learned anything from the botched appropriation of Abitibi mill,
3760
Given that Manitoba Hydro has admitted to vast cost overruns, is Premier confident that they can be trusted with our project,
3190
Government to compel Nalcor to submit the proposed Muskrat Falls development to the Board of Commissioners of Public Utilities for a complete review
Has an industrial power rate been established for the Labrador mining industry,
2044
Has government or Nalcor begun consulting with Nunatsiavut government as dictated in the Labrador Inuit Land Claims Agreement,
2844
Has independent engineer charged with reviewing DG3 capital cost estimates been put in place,
4212
Has Minister discussed project with Christian Labour Association of Canada,
2229–2230
Has Minister made commitment to pay $30 million to Emera if they decide to break the contract on the Maritime Link and decide not to build it,
3418–3419
Has Nalcor looked at numbers for keeping all of power in Province
versus the thirty-five year power contract with Emera,
2045
Has Nalcor purchased or negotiated to purchase anything pertaining to the construction of work camps from Manitoba Hydro,
3321
Has Nalcor required SNC-Lavalin to post a performance bond related to the project,
1128
Has Premier spoken to federal government about Innu court action to stop project and will there be another delay in federal loan guarantee,
1023
Has Province considered the social and economic implications of removing the rate stabilization formula by raising rates to the proposed 15.3 cents per kilowatt hour in just 5 years,
3383
Has there been analysis of the Environmental Impact Statement, construction time frame, or cost,
2003
Have discussions with federal government taken place about loan guarantee, given increased project costs,
2229
The House now supports the development of the Muskrat Falls Hydro Project
How can government meet end of November deadline,
3077
How can government sanction project without knowing full details of loan guarantee,
3256
How can Minister sell Muskrat energy when it fails to meet New England renewable criteria,
1189
How can Premier justify going ahead with project when water management agreements are untested, Emera is not confirmed as a partner, and Aboriginal environment claims are unsettled,
3019
How can Premier proceed with borrowing billions when Province cannot handle a three-quarter billion dollar deficit,
3699
How can Premier sanction a project that places considerable risk on the backs of province's ratepayers,
3380
How can Premier say that Emera does not need regulatory approval for Maritime Link,
3316–3317
How can the Public Utilities Board be good enough for one job, but not to review the project,
2908–2909
How could Minister decide to sanction the project when he does not even have a full list of the default events,
3532
How could Premier agree to include a non-exhaustive list on what would trigger a default,
3531–3532
How do Chief of Natuashish's public comments impact viability of project,
2644
How does negative financial outlook for Emera affect agreements with government,
921
How is it fair that the same power will go to Maritime Canada at a cheaper rate than to Newfoundlanders, and some Labrador communities obtain power from Quebec at 55 per cent greater cost than Quebec residents,
3079
How much did Nalcor spend on project in October and how much did government transfer to Nalcor to cover those expenses,
3077
How much has government paid to Manitoba Hydro for material purchased for project,
3382
How much has Nalcor committed to SNC-Lavalin,
1076
How much money has province put into project to date,
3317
How much of taxpayers' money will government have committed to before July 2014,
3250
How much was spent on Muskrat Falls in November,
3532–3533
How much will government spend before they know whether they qualify for the federal loan guarantee,
3598
How will government address the immediate and future adverse effects on residents of Upper Lake Melville communities and Rigolet,
160
How will government ensure long term financial gains for Province,
377
How will government get power to the Labrador mining industry,
2273
How will government protect interests of Labradorians to ensure they receive maximum benefits from project,
3078
How will mining companies access power from Muskrat Falls,
3021
How will Minister address municipal funding needs to enable them to cover rising electricity costs,
212
How will power be delivered to Labrador for mining industry, given the absence of registered transmission lines,
109
How will problem with design affect deal Nalcor is negotiating with Emera in Nova Scotia,
928
If all the required purchased power is not used, will the ratepayers still have to pay for the power,
3427
If Emera has until 2014, why not send project to the Public Utilities Board for a full independent review,
3249
If Emera pays less than 20 per cent of the project will they still receive 20 per cent of the power,
2228
If Emera walks away, will Nalcor commit to build the $1.5 million Maritime Link or risk losing the loan guarantee,
3376–3377
If forty per cent of the power is earmarked for the island, will the other sixty per cent remain in Labrador if the demand exists,
2044
If government's predictions about mining potential in Labrador come to fruition, who will get priority for power,
3020–3021
If power is needed for Labrador mining to proceed, why continue with agreement with Emera,
2044–2045
If project goes over budget, where will extra cash come from, and is there a cap for Province,
329
If the financing is so sound, why is Premier hiding the details,
2914,
2915
If we do not meet the demand forecast for power, will the ratepayer and taxpayer be left on the hook,
3322
Implications for ratepayers in change in price of oil,
2963
Inability to see where money is being spent, if Auditor General cannot see Nalcor records,
329–330
Incomplete question,
3145
Is 2 per cent per annum increase in power purchase agreement price a fixed rate,
701
Is federal government satisfied that Term 3.5 of term sheet has been met with respect to Nunatsiavut and NunatuKavut,
3377
Is government determined to build project at all costs on backs of people of province,
3257
Is government investigating the possible need of a consumption advisory regarding Lake Melville,
161
Is government now prepared to send project to a full review of the Public Utilities Board,
3190
Is government's zeal for the project blinding them to the wisdom of energy efficiency,
3141
Is motion on east-west power grid being moved because govenment cannot get deal with Emera,
2236
Is Nalcor or the Premier deciding where the $2 billion is being spent,
3250
Is new cost estimate closer to $9 billion, with interest during construction and increased costs of Maritime Link,
2781
Is Premier still confident in American markets for this power,
2043
Is Premier using 12 per cent as cost overrun number only to keep the published cost of the project low,
3189
In light of damning Public Utilities Board report, will Premier mandate a further review,
809
Need for power,
3202–3203
Permit independent reviews as recommended by Joint Review Panel,
47
Permit Public Utilities Board to compare Muskrat Falls to other options,
48
Power rates will not double,
1991(23)
Projected cash flow to confirm whether project has significant long-term benefits to Province,
2177–2178
Provide House with documents showing how work camp purchases were transacted,
3706
Province secures agreement on terms for federal loan guarantee,
3243–3244
Purpose of private meeting with Nova Scotia Premier,
1077
Reason for delay in finalizing arrangements between Emera and Nalcor,
2229
Report to House what has been done to reply to recommendations of the Joint Review Panel,
160
At sanction time, if Emera pays less than 20 per cent for the Maritime Link, will they still receive 20 per cent of the power,
2228
Since price tag for project keeps going up, what is the new cost for Muskrat Falls power delivered to Soldiers Pond,
2955
Since the project has not been sanctioned, has any money been spent by Nalcor,
2781
State full expenses beyond those included in projected cost,
47
Table documents outlining how electricity costs were arrived at,
159
Table five year cash flow projections from Nalcor so people can better understand where equity is coming from,
107–108
Table text of power purchase agreement between Nalcor and Newfoundland and Labrador Hydro,
108
Table the Request for Proposals and signed contract with Nalcor and SNC-Lavalin,
1236
Trustworthiness of Environmental Impact Statement containing Newfoundland and Labrador-specific information,
1785–1786
Was government tendering process followed in purchase of work camp purchases,
3706
Was there a meeting with Premier Dexter and Emera,
1077
What analysis has government done on higher energy costs for schools, hospitals and government buildings,
3197
What bargaining power will province have if Emera tries to drive a hard bargain on Maritime Link deal,
3256
What else did government give up to Emera besides the out clause,
3540
What firm agreements are in place for Muskrat Falls power for Labrador,
108–109
What is government's plan for energy blackouts that residents will experience between 2015 and 2018,
1356–1357
What is new timeline for project sanction,
585
What is Premier's position on government funding for transmission lines for Labrador mining,
2274
What is the debt-to-equity ratio for Muskrat Falls,
1575
What is the delivered construction cost of power to Soldiers Pond,
3592
What is the new limit on the amount of debt that the Muskrat Falls project can carry,
3764
What is the new, updated cost for power delivered to Soldiers Pond,
2955–2956
What is the plan for two years of brownouts,
1417
What mining companies have been offered power, and at what terms,
2002–2003
What other secret deals has government signed with Emera,
3419
At what point will government see a return on its $2 billion investment,
1416–1417
What price increases can be expected after 2017,
702
What price is anticipated for the American market,
2043
What was price per kilowatt hour for using natural gas as alternate energy source,
585
What will government do about contamination in Lake Melville,
161
When can government predict a rate of return,
1417
When Premier threw $16,000 sanction party, did she already know she would be firing hundreds of people a few months later,
4211
When the power purchase agreement is finalized, will government bring it back to the Public Utilities Board for analysis,
2739
When will government end secrecy and offer monthly updates on the progress of the project,
4212
When will Minister give people a firm, guaranteed price per kilowatt hour that will appear on their monthly bill when project comes online,
3025
Which entities of Nalcor does Section 4.11 refer to,
3424
Why are NunatuKavut people being denied their Aboriginal rights without consultation or compensation,
3594
Why are people of Province getting less of a review of the project than Nova Scotians,
531
Why did government reject recommendation of greater examination of renewable energy sources,
377
Why did Minister not commit to formal review of project's finances,
368–369
Why did Nalcor tie two per cent to general inflation over fifty years,
702
Why did Premier break commitment to not spend money without project sanction,
2843
Why did Premier cave and settle for allowing Emera to be in driver's seat,
3249
Why did Premier not conduct independent reviews as recommended by Joint Review Panel,
53
Why did Premier wait for more than two and a half weeks before providing bills to the Opposition for their review,
3759–3760
Why dismiss Joint Panel recommendation for analysis of alternatives,
368
Why does Minister not want to share the DG3 number with people of the province,
2956
Why does Minister see Public Utilities Board as good enough to be involved in industrial rates in Labrador, but not to set the Muskrat Falls power rates,
3535
Why does Premier allow Minister to dismiss Joint Review Panel report,
590
Why does Premier continue to play games with the Opposition around the discussion of the project,
3319–3320
Why does term sheet contain such loose terms that could set up this government to put $1 billion loan guarantee promise in jeopardy,
3591
Why doesn't Premier trust the Public Utilities Board to do its job in relation to Muskrat Falls as it does with other corporations,
3597
Why has Minister committed to giving away $30 million of taxpayers' money to Emera to help them get out of their commitment to the Maritime Link,
3418
Why has term sheet been kept secret, and will Minister release it publicly,
3251
Why have a special debate in the House if the project is fait accompli,
2005
Why is commitment to shut down Holyrood not included in bill's definition of the project,
3808
Why is government continuing to resist to allow the Public Utilities Board to look at the final Decision Gate Numbers,
1241
Why is government exempting Muskrat Falls electricity transmissions from the Public Utilities Board,
3538
Why is government giving a Nova Scotian company the right to expropriate land in this province,
3761
Why is government prepared to bypass coastal communities of Labrador to bring transmission line to island, Nova Scotia, and New England cottagers, without a long-term power solution for Labrador's communities,
3077–3078
Why is Premier allowing strong-arm tactics on Aboriginal elders to push project through,
3593
Why is Premier dismissing Joint Review Panel report,
589
Why is Premier failing to follow Labrador Inuit Land Claims Agreement requirements when it comes to Muskrat Falls,
3379–3380
Why is Premier holding back terms of reference for the Ziff Energy study on natural gas,
3018–3019
Why is Premier removing Public Utilities Board from setting energy rates for people of Province, to be set by officials at Nalcor,
3375–3376
Why isn't Emera paying taxes on the property that they are using,
3761
Why was $655 million for project not included in householder distributed throughout province,
1643
Why was natural gas study by Ziff Energy not disclosed,
858
Why will government not give taxpayers the protection of sending project back to the Public Utilities Board,
3198
Why will Premier not own up to the fact that cost overruns could put the Muskrat Falls project into Emera's hands,
3539
Why won't government put brakes on project and send it back to the Public Utilities Board for a full regulatory review,
3255
Why won't Premier allow a fully open and transparent process in the Province,
2786
Will expropriation appeal panel be independent, or politically appointed,
3809
Will finalized details of the power purchase agreement be available prior to the special debate,
2738–2739
Will government become directly involved with building new transmission capacity for Labrador mining and industry,
3021
Will government commit that project revenue be used to offset the rates for taxpayers, who are paying for project,
2957–2958
Will government guarantee that Nalcor's electric bill projections will be frozen even if we have to use the potential profits from the sale of excess power sales,
3145
Will government terminate agreement with Emera Energy and leave power in Labrador for communities and industry,
109–110
Will Minister advise House what the role of the Public Utilities Board will be in relation to the Muskrat Falls project,
3597
Will Minister allow Public Utilities Board the opportunity to consider all options, as they will in Nova Scotia,
586
Will Minister allow Public Utilities Board the opportunity to review all of the information,
1236
Will Minister confirm a date to decommission Holyrood,
3808
Will Minister direct Nalcor to stop spending with SNC-Lavalin until police have sorted out scandal,
1235
Will Minister make public the details of the take-or-pay arrangement,
3322
Will Minister share further details on changing the Public Utilities Board,
3767
Will Minister table the documents that were actually requested,
271
Will power rates in the Province not be set by officials at Nalcor or by Cabinet,
3419
Will Premier allow Public Utilities Board to analyze all options before committing to fifty year agreement on Muskrat Falls,
747
Will Premier amend legislation to commit to shutdown of Holyrood Generating Station,
3809
Will Premier break her promise and sanction project based on a term sheet rather than a finalized loan guarantee,
3248
Will Premier do what people are asking for and allow the Public Utilities Board to review the new project numbers,
2784
Will Premier explain the $30 million penalty that government has agreed to pay if Emera backs out of the deal,
3762
Will Premier give House a guaranteed cost per kilowatt hour,
113,
114
Will Premier honour commitment to allow seventy-two hours of preparation time for the Muskrat Falls legislation,
3700–3701
Will Premier listen to electorate, and give the Public Utilities Board the chance to conduct an independent review,
3700
Will Premier make loan guarantee reports available to the people of the Province,
3598
Will Premier now commit to same level of study on natural gas, wind, conservation and demand-side management,
922
Will Premier promise House bimonthly updates, including cash flow and cost information, and reports on construction deadlines,
3320
Will Premier remove doubt from people's minds by allowing a full and open review,
2785–2786
Will Premier reveal details of SNC-Lavalin contract with government and Nalcor, for $60 million engineering and project management,
3188
Will Premier sanction project that is currently before the courts,
431
Will Premier share analysis of alternative energy options,
375–376
Will Premier table Nalcor's 2011 and 2012 load forecasts,
860
Will the Maritime Link, which is 100% owned by Emera, go all the way to Granite canal in Central Newfoundland,
3138
Will the project have regulatory review, and if so, who will do it,
3255
Would project go ahead without Emera,
330